Hypothesis of a General Theory of Evolution
Hello. Before giving a link to my works, I would like to say a few words about the crisis of evolutionary theory. This crisis is felt not only by the scientific community directly engaged with issues related to evolutionary theory, including the author of this site; it is felt directly in...
Hello. Before giving a link to my works, I would like to say a few words about the crisis of evolutionary theory. This crisis is felt not only by the scientific community directly engaged with issues related to evolutionary theory, including the author of this site, Dmitry Shabanov; it is felt directly in human society. Many phenomena of human behavior, difficult aspects of intergroup relations, and the phenomenon of human consciousness are hard to explain from the standpoint of modern evolutionary theory. Modern evolutionary theory, both synthetic and epigenetic, is based on the practically unlimited capacity of the genome. The hypothesis proposed here assumes that although the genome has enormous informational capacity, at a certain stage of evolution the limit of its informational capacity was nevertheless reached. Therefore, further evolutionary development proceeded along the path of transmitting information to subsequent generations, both genetically through the genome and non-genetically through learning and upbringing. Such an assumption makes it possible to discern very interesting regularities in the evolutionary development of biological species. The proposed hypothesis describes biological mechanisms of information protection. These protective mechanisms play an important role in the current crisis of evolutionary theory. They prevent scientists studying humans as a biological species from seeing regularities that conflict with their already established views; otherwise there arises a feeling of psychic instability. As D. Krishnamurti aptly put it, the problem is that "the observer is the observed." I managed to overcome this barrier because when I began to feel its effect on my psyche, I already knew that it was only an apparent feeling of danger and that I could proceed without fearing the consequences. Although I do not hide the fact that these sensations are unpleasant. It is possible that while reading my works, if what is written in them does not accord with your established views, you may experience a negative emotional reaction. I do not need the hypothesis I propose to be accepted on faith; I only wanted to ask that conclusions not be drawn too hastily. In mathematics there is a method of proof by contradiction, so if possible, try to look at the surrounding world from the standpoint of the proposed hypothesis. In addition, I am ready to defend my point of view in discussion. The proposed hypothesis was formulated in the first of the works offered here 13 years ago. Over the intervening time I have repeatedly tried to draw the attention of scientists both in our country and abroad to it, and unfortunately have not succeeded. Nevertheless, I experiment by applying the knowledge gained in my own life. The results are visible to all the people with whom I have to interact. However, no one dares to follow this path, since this knowledge is not recognized by science and is not widely known. I have managed to solve most of my psychological problems; in fact, I came to this knowledge along the path of resolving my rather painful problems. I am not a biologist, and in the proposed works there may be errors in specific issues; however, my observations of people, conversations with them, and also the result of experiments in my own life, give me grounds to say with a probability close to 100% that the proposed hypothesis reflects reality more accurately than the existing evolutionary theory. My works can be read here: https://lshp.narod.ru/