Vertebrate Zoology-2016. Test on Topic II of the Course
Results of testing on Topic II of the course
Dear second-year students, I can finally share the results of the fish testing. I hope to present the overall picture soon (taking into account the grades you received when submitting topics to your instructors). First of all, a few words about how I decided to assign grades for the testing. During the testing, your results are obtained, expressed as a percentage of correct answers. I need to convert this into points. In the ecology course in 2015, I took the best result as 100% of the maximum grade, and for the worst answer that, in my opinion, deserved a "satisfactory" grade (i.e., the weakest "three"), I gave 50% of the maximum number of points. As experience has shown, this is not the best option: only one person received the maximum grade, and everyone else, even those who were slightly behind, lost points. In the introductory lecture, I said that I would choose the "worst" three, the "worst" five, and the best result. I calculated as planned... but it seemed inconvenient, so I decided to calculate it a bit differently. I will explain first with an example. Below is the distribution of results, from worst to best, and the corresponding grading method. The maximum grade of 4 points is used as an example. Look: the range of results from 0% to 49% is divided into the number of sub-ranges corresponding to half of the maximum grade (the first is zero points, the last is one less than half of the maximum grade). The range from 50% to 100% is divided into the number of sub-ranges one greater than half of the maximum grade (the first is half the maximum score, the last is the maximum score). If the maximum score is four, the first half of the scale is divided into two parts, and the second half into three. For the second test in the vertebrate zoology course, as stated in the rules of this course, 8 points are given, for the third and fourth – 10 points each. The previous distribution was artificial, uniform. And below is the actual distribution of grades you received for the test. Above the scatter plot is a histogram describing the distribution of your work by the number of correct answers, to the right is a histogram showing the distribution of obtained grades. I considered works with more than a third of correct answers to be satisfactory. And now – the results of each student separately. Before presenting them, I want to apologize if I misspelled someone's name or group. Many of you, when filling out the "name" field on the answer sheet, provided an initial instead of a name; I know the names of some of you from the instructors who conduct practical classes. It is likely that not all of those enrolled in the course (but who did not take the test) are listed in my list. Finally, groups are not indicated for all students. Please, if you see an error in the list, do not be offended by it, but let me know what needs to be corrected (for example, in the comments on this page).
Student
Group
% of correct answers
Point
Avdeeva Alyna
42,0
5
Ahapyy Anastasyya
BM-21
58,0
7
Adonkyna Yryna
BH-21
38,0
4
Akzhyhytov Rustam
BM-21
47,0
5
Aksyonov D.
BF-21
Al-Amudy Alyvyya
BH-21
56,0
7
Andreev Dmytryy
BG-21
35,0
4
Aristova O.
BF-21
48,0
6
Artemova Olha
BG-21
39,0
4
Barannykova Sofyya
BM-21
28,0
3
Baskakova Mayia
BH-21
61,0
7
Belova Daria
BM-21
46,0
5
Beskorovaynyy Ye.
B-121
Boyko E.
BH-21
Bondareva Yana
B-121
49,0
6
Bondarenko Andrey
BM-21
68,0
8
Bunel Liubov
BH-21
39,0
4
Vasylyenko V.
BH-21
56,0
7
Vasylenko Krystyna
BM-21
29,0
3
Vyniukova Anna
BH-21
66,0
8
Volovyk Ekateryna
BG-21
37,0
4
Vyplavyn Tymofey
BH-21
56,0
7
Viunyk Elyzaveta
BM-21
66,0
8
Havyley Anastasyya
BG-21
46,0
5
Hayvoronskaya Elyzaveta
BM-21
39,0
4
Hetman Ya.
B-121(BG-21)
Honcharenko Nykyta
BH-21
46,0
5
Honcharenko T.
B-124
Honcharov Roman
B-121
41,0
5
Hordyenko Maryya
B-123
36,0
4
Grechkovska A.
B-122
68,0
8
Hryhorenko Roman
BF-21
46,0
5
Hryneva Valeryya
BG-21
45,0
5
Dely Oksana
BF-21
43,0
5
Dobrohorskaya Yana
BG-21
48,0
6
Drych A.
B-121
37,0
4
Ermakov Danyyl
BH-21
61,0
7
Zykyna Yryna
B-121
41,0
5
Kashyna Anna
B-121
40,0
4
Klynovaya Aleksandra
B-122
62,0
7
Kolbasova L.
B-121
51,0
6
Kolodey Anna
BG-21
42,0
5
Korobkova Anhelyna
BG-21
54,0
6
Kulykova Ekateryna
BG-21
39,0
4
Lenkevych Ekateryna
B-122
31,0
3
Lozynskaya Karyna
B-122
37,0
4
Liubka Aleksandra
B-121
51,0
6
Mazanko Evhenyy
BF-21
32,0
3
Mamedov S.
BF-21
32,0
3
Marynenko Ekateryna
B-121
32,0
3
Markovskaya Oksana
B-122
65,0
8
Marchenko D.
B-121
Matveeva Yulyya
B-123
56,0
7
Myrenkova Yana
B-123
34,0
4
Mohylevtseva Alyna
BF-21
43,0
5
Nazarova Anastasyya
B-123
38,0
4
Nedashkovskaya Oksana
B-122
33,0
4
Orel Vyoletta
B-124
47,0
5
Otchenashenko Alyna
B-122
48,0
6
Perehynets Anna
B-124
42,0
5
Podpriatova Yulyya
BH-21
39,0
4
Ponomarev Serhey
B-122
58,0
7
Popova A.
BF-21
Predybaylo Olha
BG-21
39,0
4
Prudkaya Ania
BG-21
22,0
2
Rezunenko A.
BH-21
63,0
8
Romanov Danyyl
BG-21
27,0
3
Rudenko I.
B-123
Rusachenko Evhenyy
BH-21
59,0
7
Rybalko A.
BF-21
47,0
5
Riabchenko Anastasyya
B-124
33,0
4
Selyna Anastasyya
B-124
44,0
5
Semeniuk Maryna
BF-21
29,0
3
Skorbatiuk Maryna
B-123
48,0
6
Tadzhiev D.
BF-21
Tarasenko Ekateryna
B-124
50,0
6
Tymofeeva Olha
BG-21
50,0
6
Tovstukha Yhor
B-122
60,0
7
Trotsenko N.
B-122
37,0
4
Umyrova E.
B-121
Fedyk Evhenyy
B-123
39,0
4
Fokyna Maryya
BH-21
58,0
7
Khmylko Bohdan
B-123
30,0
3
Kholykova Makhlye
BM-21
39,0
4
Shevchenko Aleksandr
BH-21
67,0
8
Sheyka Maryya
BG-21
48,0
6
Sherstiuk Daria
BH-21
69,0
8
Shomyna Polyna
B-123
53,0
6
Shpak Liubov
BM-21
57,0
7
Shubyna Sofyya
B-123
28,0
3
Shcherban Tatiana
BH-21
54,0
6
Yakymchuk Yu.
B-122
46,0
5
Don't worry if you got less than you wanted. If you try hard, you can retake it. It's worst for those who didn't take the test... Let's keep working!