Ecology-2015. Results of Work During the Semester
That's it. The ecology course is complete. Out of 103 students on the roster, 34 did not receive credit (6 people earned 0 points altogether), and 69, respectively, did receive credit. Here are the results, the rules for makeup and retake exams. P.S. The following credit submission deadlines are: — Wednesday, December 23, IV...
That's it. The ecology course is complete. The credit test remains, which not everyone will take. At the beginning are the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eli Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanyna, I can inform you of the results today. So, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered a decisive blow, separating herself from all other students. Her result (and only hers) (74%, significantly weaker than last time) is rated at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanyna's result (36%) is 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points by this calculation, and only Anya Pavliy with a result of 68% earned 22 points; Ivan Cherepashuk closes the top three. Here are the overall results for the fourth module. . Here is the table with the overall results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). For those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to give a credit; those who scored less will naturally have to take the credit test. The total number of points for those who receive credit is highlighted in red, and for those who do not, in blue.
Group
Student
Seminar attendance
Module I
Module II
Module III
Module IV
Credit
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Aloyarova Makhlie
64 %(8)
31 %(10)
31 %(11)
—(—)
29 %(10)
39
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Bazarbaev Yashnarbek
45 %(5)
5 %(6)
36 %(12)
—(—)
28 %(9)
32
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Hetman Polina
64 %(8)
35 %(11)
46 %(15)
41 %(11)
47 %(15)
60
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Kochkarova Sokhiba
73 %(9)
34 %(11)
34 %(12)
—(—)
38 %(12)
44
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Kuranbayeva Huzar
36 %(4)
—(5)
36 %(12)
—(—)
—(—)
21
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Nurmetov Daniarbek
45 %(5)
—(5)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
10
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Pavlenko Anna
73 %(9)
36 %(11)
54 %(17)
—(—)
46 %(15)
52
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Pravdyvtsev Artem
55 %(7)
—(—)
30 %(11)
20 %(8)
28 %(9)
35
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Rusanova Mariya
55 %(7)
43 %(12)
43 %(14)
24 %(8)
28 %(9)
50
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Yazhuliyev Seyran
18 %(2)
4 %(5)
—(—)
—(4)
—(—)
11
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Yakymchyk Dariya
27 %(3)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
45 %(15)
18
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Bekmetov Bakram
30 %(4)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
4
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Bondar Vitalina
60 %(7)
49 %(13)
43 %(14)
43 %(12)
44 %(14)
60
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Kochneva Yelyzaveta
90 %(11)
61 %(16)
53 %(17)
36 %(11)
58 %(19)
74
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Levchuk Valeriya
70 %(8)
53 %(14)
69 %(20)
42 %(12)
58 %(19)
73
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Mishcherykova Valeriya
90 %(11)
61 %(15)
69 %(20)
51 %(13)
56 %(18)
77
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Moshchenko Yaroslav
90 %(11)
54 %(14)
61 %(18)
49 %(13)
45 %(15)
71
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Pankov Artem
40 %(5)
60 %(15)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
20
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Petliuk Valeriya
30 %(4)
50 %(14)
44 %(14)
46 %(12)
49 %(16)
60
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Rozhnov Oleksiy
90 %(11)
49 %(13)
76 %(22)
—(—)
54 %(18)
64
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Stoyanov Roman
90 %(11)
58 %(15)
67 %(20)
68 %(16)
49 %(16)
78
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Borozna Oksana
100 %(12)
86 %(20)
84 %(24)
83 %(19)
74 %(24)
99
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Havryliuk Anna
100 %(12)
65 %(16)
72 %(21)
49 %(13)
46 %(15)
77
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Hlushach Dmytro
100 %(12)
74 %(18)
72 %(21)
64 %(15)
59 %(19)
85
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Ivanova Maryna
73 %(9)
38 %(12)
43 %(14)
41 %(11)
44 %(14)
60
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Matiankubov Borys
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Melnyk Oksana
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Cherepashuk Ivan
91 %(11)
56 %(15)
75 %(22)
78 %(18)
66 %(21)
87
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Batuyeva Yevheniya
90 %(11)
65 %(16)
74 %(21)
63 %(15)
54 %(18)
81
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Bohatyreva Anastasiya
100 %(12)
40 %(12)
59 %(18)
33 %(10)
44 %(14)
66
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Hannenko Serhiy
90 %(11)
53 %(14)
63 %(19)
46 %(12)
61 %(20)
76
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Denysenko Nataliya
30 %(4)
36 %(11)
42 %(14)
36 %(11)
43 %(14)
54
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Dubynnyk Nastia
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Zinska Anastasiya
80 %(10)
58 %(15)
64 %(19)
67 %(16)
51 %(17)
77
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Katrushenko Svitlana
100 %(12)
69 %(17)
77 %(22)
67 %(16)
53 %(17)
84
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Kushnir Maryna
60 %(7)
—(—)
69 %(20)
—(—)
—(—)
27
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Lysenko Maryna
80 %(10)
49 %(13)
57 %(18)
44 %(12)
50 %(16)
69
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Maleeva Anastasiya
100 %(12)
68 %(17)
—(—)
55 %(14)
41 %(13)
56
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Orlova Lena
100 %(12)
50 %(14)
49 %(15)
35 %(10)
41 %(13)
64
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Panasiuk Dariya
80 %(10)
—(—)
67 %(20)
57 %(14)
49 %(16)
60
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Poserednykova Kateryna
50 %(6)
46 %(13)
52 %(16)
55 %(14)
56 %(18)
67
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Prodchenko Yevheniy
90 %(11)
51 %(14)
64 %(19)
51 %(13)
59 %(19)
76
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Pustovalova Yeleonora
80 %(10)
65 %(16)
51 %(16)
81 %(19)
53 %(17)
78
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}
Stavytska Anastasiya
100 %(12)
63 %(16)
—(—)
61 %(15)
53 %(17)
60
BG-31
Bandyk Vsevolod
55 %(7)
53 %(14)
59 %(18)
59 %(15)
—(—)
54
BG-31
Berdiyev
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
BG-31
Vasylchenko Vladyslava
45 %(5)
39 %(12)
40 %(13)
30 %(9)
46 %(15)
54
BG-31
Dolhaleva Iryna
45 %(5)
44 %(13)
47 %(15)
56 %(14)
46 %(15)
62
BG-31
Dranko Mariya
82 %(10)
48 %(13)
52 %(16)
42 %(12)
38 %(12)
63
BG-31
Kovach Viktor
82 %(10)
25 %(9)
42 %(14)
39 %(11)
41 %(13)
57
BG-31
Kryklia Maryna
55 %(7)
45 %(13)
43 %(14)
—(—)
59 %(19)
53
BG-31
Luk'yanov Mykhaylo
73 %(9)
43 %(12)
74 %(21)
55 %(14)
54 %(18)
74
BG-31
Radetskyy Davyd
100 %(12)
38 %(11)
44 %(14)
27 %(9)
45 %(15)
61
BG-31
Raymkulova Mayahul
18 %(2)
4 %(5)
—(—)
14 %(6)
—(—)
13
BG-31
Saenko Illia
55 %(7)
50 %(14)
—(—)
49 %(13)
47 %(15)
49
BG-31
Sapota Yuliya
82 %(10)
60 %(15)
65 %(19)
40 %(11)
—(—)
55
BG-31
Slabynia Kseniya
100 %(12)
35 %(11)
40 %(13)
44 %(12)
44 %(14)
62
BG-31
Sliusarenko Alina
30 %(4)
44 %(13)
—(—)
39 %(11)
40 %(13)
41
BG-31
Stepchenkov Yevheniy
36 %(4)
38 %(12)
—(—)
—(—)
39 %(13)
29
BG-31
Tabachna Maryna
27 %(3)
—(—)
53 %(16)
42 %(12)
—(—)
31
BG-31
Urazbayeva Zulfiya
45 %(5)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
5
BG-31
Ustymenko Rostyslav
55 %(7)
35 %(11)
45 %(15)
33 %(10)
36 %(12)
55
BG-31
Filatova Maryna
100 %(12)
56 %(15)
52 %(16)
49 %(13)
53 %(17)
73
BG-31
Chokhalov
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
BM-31
Abdula Iryna
73 %(9)
37 %(11)
53 %(17)
44 %(12)
38 %(12)
61
BM-31
Belovetska Svitlana
82 %(10)
38 %(12)
44 %(14)
42 %(12)
46 %(15)
63
BM-31
Hlazkova Vladyslava
45 %(5)
—(—)
44 %(14)
43 %(12)
58 %(19)
50
BM-31
Hudkova Dar'ya
73 %(9)
30 %(10)
42 %(14)
40 %(11)
38 %(13)
57
BM-31
Dehtereva Kateryna
73 %(9)
37 %(11)
62 %(18)
42 %(12)
46 %(15)
65
BM-31
Dudka Viktoriya
73 %(9)
49 %(13)
64 %(19)
40 %(11)
—(—)
52
BM-31
Zuban Ruslana
18 %(2)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
2
BM-31
Ivanov Ivan
91 %(11)
56 %(15)
64 %(19)
59 %(15)
56 %(18)
78
BM-31
Kuriata Valeriya
100 %(12)
59 %(15)
69 %(20)
47 %(12)
44 %(14)
73
BM-31
Osadcha Nataliya
64 %(8)
60 %(15)
66 %(19)
38 %(11)
45 %(15)
68
BM-31
Pesotska Alena
0 %(0)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
0
BM-31
Peshnina Antonina
91 %(11)
35 %(11)
45 %(15)
48 %(13)
43 %(14)
64
BM-31
Stolnyk Anastasiya
36 %(4)
44 %(13)
62 %(19)
34 %(10)
38 %(12)
58
BM-31
Ushakova Yevheniya
91 %(11)
56 %(15)
69 %(20)
48 %(13)
42 %(14)
73
BM-31
Filippovych Anna
18 %(2)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
2
BM-31
Cherkasova Olha
55 %(7)
40 %(12)
—(—)
38 %(11)
42 %(14)
44
BF-31
Avezova Zulkhumar
40 %(5)
35 %(11)
—(—)
—(—)
—(—)
16
BF-31
Verdzhi Leyla
80 %(10)
32 %(10)
41 %(14)
44 %(12)
39 %(13)
59
BF-31
Honcharenko Olena
90 %(11)
46 %(13)
61 %(18)
31 %(10)
38 %(13)
65
BF-31
Dukhanyna Marharyta
90 %(11)
44 %(13)
58 %(18)
51 %(13)
36 %(12)
67
BF-31
Yepryntseva Iryna
100 %(12)
46 %(13)
49 %(16)
59 %(15)
41 %(13)
69
BF-31
Zbarska Diana
40 %(5)
—(—)
—(—)
42 %(12)
—(—)
17
BF-31
Ishymbetova Surayo
60 %(7)
—(—)
51 %(16)
—(—)
—(—)
23
BH-31
Akieva Dikfuza
55 %(7)
21 %(9)
—(—)
15 %(7)
41 %(13)
36
BH-31
Artemova Yuliya
82 %(10)
38 %(11)
53 %(16)
41 %(11)
31 %(10)
58
BH-31
Beshentseva Tetiana
100 %(12)
45 %(13)
45 %(15)
42 %(12)
32 %(11)
63
BH-31
Voronyk Iryna
91 %(11)
55 %(14)
62 %(18)
64 %(15)
41 %(13)
71
BH-31
Haradzhayeva Arzy
55 %(7)
—(—)
—(—)
17 %(7)
—(—)
14
BH-31
Hryshkova Anastasiya
100 %(12)
36 %(11)
56 %(17)
41 %(11)
—(—)
51
BH-31
Dakhnova Diana
91 %(11)
58 %(15)
72 %(21)
49 %(13)
47 %(15)
75
BH-31
Zhadanenko Yuliya
91 %(11)
43 %(12)
63 %(19)
38 %(11)
43 %(14)
67
BH-31
Lavrikova Sofiya
100 %(12)
61 %(16)
70 %(20)
52 %(13)
51 %(17)
78
BH-31
Mashovets Anastasiya
82 %(10)
58 %(15)
59 %(18)
45 %(12)
49 %(16)
71
BH-31
Murzabayev Maruf
64 %(8)
19 %(8)
23 %(9)
17 %(7)
19 %(7)
39
BH-31
Pavliy Anna
100 %(12)
83 %(19)
85 %(24)
89 %(20)
68 %(22)
97
BH-31
Pardayeva Merkhriban
73 %(9)
23 %(9)
28 %(10)
29 %(9)
32 %(11)
48
BH-31
Skyrda Oleksandr
73 %(9)
53 %(14)
50 %(16)
50 %(13)
54 %(18)
70
BH-31
Smyrnova Anastasiya
36 %(4)
42 %(12)
55 %(17)
—(—)
44 %(14)
47
BH-31
Kharchenko Tetiana
82 %(10)
67 %(17)
60 %(18)
60 %(15)
53 %(17)
77
{"translated_text": "That's it. The ecology course is over. There remains the pass/fail exam, which not everyone will take.\n\nFirst — the results of Module IV. You only finished writing it today, but thanks to the help of Eleonora Pustovalova and Rita Dukhanina, I can inform you of the results today.\n\nSo, Oksana Borozna gathered her courage and delivered the decisive blow, pulling ahead of all other students. Her result (and only hers — 74%, significantly weaker than last time) is assessed at 24 points, and Rita Dukhanina's result (36%) — at 12 points. Interestingly, no one earned 23 points with this calculation, and only Ania Pavlii with 68% got 22 points; the top three is rounded out by Ivan Cherepashuk.\n\nHere are the general results of the fourth module.\n[IMG_1]\n\nHere is the table with the general results for the entire semester (including the fourth module). To those who scored 50 or more points, I am ready to award a pass; those who scored less will, of course, have to take the exam. The total number of points for those who receive a pass is highlighted in red, and for those who do not receive a pass — in blue.\n\nGroup\n\nStudent\n\nSeminar\nattendance\n\nI\nmodule\n\nII\nmodule\n\nIII\nmodule\n\nIV\nmodule\n\nPass/Fail\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nAloyarova Mahliyo\n\n64%(8)\n\n31%(10)\n\n31%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n29%(10)\n\n39\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nBazarbaev Yashnarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n5%(6)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n28%(9)\n\n32\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nHetman Polina\n\n64%(8)\n\n35%(11)\n\n46%(15)\n\n41%(11)\n\n47%(15)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKochkarova Sokhiba\n\n73%(9)\n\n34%(11)\n\n34%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nKuranbaeva Guzar\n\n36%(4)\n\n—(5)\n\n36%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n21\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nNurmetov Danyarbek\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n10\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPavlenko Anna\n\n73%(9)\n\n36%(11)\n\n54%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n46%(15)\n\n52\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nPravdivtsev Artem\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n30%(11)\n\n20%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n35\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nRusanova Maria\n\n55%(7)\n\n43%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n24%(8)\n\n28%(9)\n\n50\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYazguliev Seiran\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n11\n\n\n\nB-131\n\nYakimchik Daria\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n45%(15)\n\n18\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBekmetov Bakram\n\n30%(4)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n4\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nBondar Vitalina\n\n60%(7)\n\n49%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nKochneva Yelizaveta\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n36%(11)\n\n58%(19)\n\n74\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nLevchuk Valeriya\n\n70%(8)\n\n53%(14)\n\n69%(20)\n\n42%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n73\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMischerikova Valeriya\n\n90%(11)\n\n61%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n51%(13)\n\n56%(18)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nMoshchenko Yaroslav\n\n90%(11)\n\n54%(14)\n\n61%(18)\n\n49%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n71\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPankov Artem\n\n40%(5)\n\n60%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n20\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nPetlyuk Valeriya\n\n30%(4)\n\n50%(14)\n\n44%(14)\n\n46%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nRozhnov Aleksey\n\n90%(11)\n\n49%(13)\n\n76%(22)\n\n—(—)\n\n54%(18)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-132\n\nStoyanov Roman\n\n90%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n67%(20)\n\n68%(16)\n\n49%(16)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nBorozna Oksana\n\n100%(12)\n\n86%(20)\n\n84%(24)\n\n83%(19)\n\n74%(24)\n\n99\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGavrylyuk Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n65%(16)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n46%(15)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nGlushach Dmytro\n\n100%(12)\n\n74%(18)\n\n72%(21)\n\n64%(15)\n\n59%(19)\n\n85\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nIvanova Maryna\n\n73%(9)\n\n38%(12)\n\n43%(14)\n\n41%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMatyankubov Boris\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nMelnik Oksana\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-133\n\nCherepashuk Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n75%(22)\n\n78%(18)\n\n66%(21)\n\n87\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBatueva Yevgeniya\n\n90%(11)\n\n65%(16)\n\n74%(21)\n\n63%(15)\n\n54%(18)\n\n81\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nBogatyryova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n40%(12)\n\n59%(18)\n\n33%(10)\n\n44%(14)\n\n66\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nGannen Sergey\n\n90%(11)\n\n53%(14)\n\n63%(19)\n\n46%(12)\n\n61%(20)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDenysenko Nataliya\n\n30%(4)\n\n36%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n36%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n54\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nDubinik Nastya\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nZinskaya Anastasiya\n\n80%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n67%(16)\n\n51%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKatrushenko Svetlana\n\n100%(12)\n\n69%(17)\n\n77%(22)\n\n67%(16)\n\n53%(17)\n\n84\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nKushnir Maryna\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n69%(20)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n27\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nLysenko Maryna\n\n80%(10)\n\n49%(13)\n\n57%(18)\n\n44%(12)\n\n50%(16)\n\n69\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nMaleyeva Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n68%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n55%(14)\n\n41%(13)\n\n56\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nOrlova Lena\n\n100%(12)\n\n50%(14)\n\n49%(15)\n\n35%(10)\n\n41%(13)\n\n64\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPanasyuk Darya\n\n80%(10)\n\n—(—)\n\n67%(20)\n\n57%(14)\n\n49%(16)\n\n60\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPosrednikova Yekaterina\n\n50%(6)\n\n46%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n55%(14)\n\n56%(18)\n\n67\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nProdchenko Yevgeniy\n\n90%(11)\n\n51%(14)\n\n64%(19)\n\n51%(13)\n\n59%(19)\n\n76\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nPustovalova Eleonora\n\n80%(10)\n\n65%(16)\n\n51%(16)\n\n81%(19)\n\n53%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nB-134\n\nStavitskaya Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n63%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n61%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n60\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBandyk Vsevolod\n\n55%(7)\n\n53%(14)\n\n59%(18)\n\n59%(15)\n\n—(—)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nBerdyev\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nVasilchenko Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n39%(12)\n\n40%(13)\n\n30%(9)\n\n46%(15)\n\n54\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDohaleva Irina\n\n45%(5)\n\n44%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n56%(14)\n\n46%(15)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nDranko Maria\n\n82%(10)\n\n48%(13)\n\n52%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKovach Viktor\n\n82%(10)\n\n25%(9)\n\n42%(14)\n\n39%(11)\n\n41%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nKryklya Maryna\n\n55%(7)\n\n45%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n59%(19)\n\n53\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nLukyanov Mikhail\n\n73%(9)\n\n43%(12)\n\n74%(21)\n\n55%(14)\n\n54%(18)\n\n74\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRadetskiy David\n\n100%(12)\n\n38%(11)\n\n44%(14)\n\n27%(9)\n\n45%(15)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nRaikmulova Mayagul\n\n18%(2)\n\n4%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n14%(6)\n\n—(—)\n\n13\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSayenko Ilya\n\n55%(7)\n\n50%(14)\n\n—(—)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n49\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSapota Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n60%(15)\n\n65%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyobynya Kseniya\n\n100%(12)\n\n35%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n44%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n62\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nSlyusarenko Alina\n\n30%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(11)\n\n40%(13)\n\n41\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nStepchenkov Yevgeniy\n\n36%(4)\n\n38%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n39%(13)\n\n29\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nTabachnaya Maryna\n\n27%(3)\n\n—(—)\n\n53%(16)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n31\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUrazbayeva Zulfiya\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n5\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nUstymenko Rostyslav\n\n55%(7)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n33%(10)\n\n36%(12)\n\n55\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nFilatova Maryna\n\n100%(12)\n\n56%(15)\n\n52%(16)\n\n49%(13)\n\n53%(17)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBG-31\n\nChokhalov\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nAbdula Irina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n53%(17)\n\n44%(12)\n\n38%(12)\n\n61\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nBelovetskaya Svetlana\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGlazkova Vladyslava\n\n45%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n43%(12)\n\n58%(19)\n\n50\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nGudkova Darya\n\n73%(9)\n\n30%(10)\n\n42%(14)\n\n40%(11)\n\n38%(13)\n\n57\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDegtereva Yekaterina\n\n73%(9)\n\n37%(11)\n\n62%(18)\n\n42%(12)\n\n46%(15)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nDudka Viktoriya\n\n73%(9)\n\n49%(13)\n\n64%(19)\n\n40%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n52\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nZuban Ruslana\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nIvanov Ivan\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n64%(19)\n\n59%(15)\n\n56%(18)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nKuryata Valeriya\n\n100%(12)\n\n59%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n47%(12)\n\n44%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nOsadchaya Nataliya\n\n64%(8)\n\n60%(15)\n\n66%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n68\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPesotskaya Alena\n\n0%(0)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n0\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nPeshchina Antonina\n\n91%(11)\n\n35%(11)\n\n45%(15)\n\n48%(13)\n\n43%(14)\n\n64\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nStolnik Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n44%(13)\n\n62%(19)\n\n34%(10)\n\n38%(12)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nUshakova Yevgeniya\n\n91%(11)\n\n56%(15)\n\n69%(20)\n\n48%(13)\n\n42%(14)\n\n73\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nFilippovich Anna\n\n18%(2)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n2\n\n\n\nBM-31\n\nCherkassova Olha\n\n55%(7)\n\n40%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n38%(11)\n\n42%(14)\n\n44\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nAvezova Zulkhumar\n\n40%(5)\n\n35%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n16\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nVerdzhi Leyla\n\n80%(10)\n\n32%(10)\n\n41%(14)\n\n44%(12)\n\n39%(13)\n\n59\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nGoncharenko Yelena\n\n90%(11)\n\n46%(13)\n\n61%(18)\n\n31%(10)\n\n38%(13)\n\n65\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nDukhanyna Maryna\n\n90%(11)\n\n44%(13)\n\n58%(18)\n\n51%(13)\n\n36%(12)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nYeprintseva Irina\n\n100%(12)\n\n46%(13)\n\n49%(16)\n\n59%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n69\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nZbarskaya Diana\n\n40%(5)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n42%(12)\n\n—(—)\n\n17\n\n\n\nBF-31\n\nIshimbetova Surayo\n\n60%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n51%(16)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n23\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nAkieva Dikfuza\n\n55%(7)\n\n21%(9)\n\n—(—)\n\n15%(7)\n\n41%(13)\n\n36\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nArtemova Yuliya\n\n82%(10)\n\n38%(11)\n\n53%(16)\n\n41%(11)\n\n31%(10)\n\n58\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nBeshentseva Tatyana\n\n100%(12)\n\n45%(13)\n\n45%(15)\n\n42%(12)\n\n32%(11)\n\n63\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nVoronuk Irina\n\n91%(11)\n\n55%(14)\n\n62%(18)\n\n64%(15)\n\n41%(13)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGaradzhaeva Arzy\n\n55%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n—(—)\n\n17%(7)\n\n—(—)\n\n14\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nGrishkova Anastasiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n36%(11)\n\n56%(17)\n\n41%(11)\n\n—(—)\n\n51\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nDakhnova Diana\n\n91%(11)\n\n58%(15)\n\n72%(21)\n\n49%(13)\n\n47%(15)\n\n75\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nZhadanenko Yuliya\n\n91%(11)\n\n43%(12)\n\n63%(19)\n\n38%(11)\n\n43%(14)\n\n67\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nLavrikova Sofiya\n\n100%(12)\n\n61%(16)\n\n70%(20)\n\n52%(13)\n\n51%(17)\n\n78\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMashovets Anastasiya\n\n82%(10)\n\n58%(15)\n\n59%(18)\n\n45%(12)\n\n49%(16)\n\n71\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nMurzabayev Maruf\n\n64%(8)\n\n19%(8)\n\n23%(9)\n\n17%(7)\n\n19%(7)\n\n39\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPavliy Anna\n\n100%(12)\n\n83%(19)\n\n85%(24)\n\n89%(20)\n\n68%(22)\n\n97\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nPardayeva Merkhriban\n\n73%(9)\n\n23%(9)\n\n28%(10)\n\n29%(9)\n\n32%(11)\n\n48\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSkirda Oleksandr\n\n73%(9)\n\n53%(14)\n\n50%(16)\n\n50%(13)\n\n54%(18)\n\n70\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nSmirnova Anastasiya\n\n36%(4)\n\n42%(12)\n\n55%(17)\n\n—(—)\n\n44%(14)\n\n47\n\n\n\nBX-31\n\nKharchenko Tatyana\n\n82%(10)\n\n67%(17)\n\n60%(18)\n\n60%(15)\n\n53%(17)\n\n77\n\n\n\nYou can assess your results using the following bar chart.\n[IMG_2]\n\nThe grading method implemented this semester made excellent grades quite rare. Note that only two people fell into the 96-100 group (Borozna and Pavliy), the 91-95 group is empty, the 86-90 group has only one person (Cherepashuk), and only in the 81-85 group there are already three (Glushach, Katrushenko, and Batueva).\n\nThose who received a pass and are satisfied with their point total can come to the seminars from December 18 to 23 themselves, or they can submit their record books through the group leaders. All who wish can improve their result. For example, if Borozna is not satisfied with 99 points and wants 100, she can come to the class at the scheduled time, draw a ticket, and answer the question on Module III. If she answers \"excellent\" — she will get her 100 points, but if she gets a \"fail\" — she will significantly lower her result (but she will still have a pass, since even then she will have more than 50 points).\n\nThe pass/fail exam will be held according to the seminar schedule from December 18 to 23; the retake will be during the examination week at a time additionally agreed upon. And now, please pay attention to what I will write.\n\nThose who did not receive a pass must retake at least the modules for which their grade is below the threshold (for Modules I and III — below 10 points, and for Modules II and IV — below 12 points). You can (having agreed with me before drawing a ticket) also take more modules. If you answer with a positive grade and score enough points — I will give you a pass (for questions that did not reach the minimum for a positive grade, I will not assign any points). If you don't reach it — at the next retake (during the examination week) you will answer all 4 questions on the ticket. Attempting to cheat means removal from the exam and answering all four questions on the tickets at the retake (with special control of independence of answers).\n\nThe questions on the tickets correspond to the course program. For each question, you must give a written concise answer within a limited time, containing an explanation of the main points that were covered during the classes and illuminated in the lecture notes.\n\nIs everything clear? If something is unclear — ask questions here. It is important that you come to take the exam prepared for what awaits you.\n\n...The difficult part of course begins: taking the pass/fail exam by those who did not earn it during the semester. Unfortunately, those with whom it was pleasant to work will have little communication now: I will simply be assigning passes (if no one rushes to improve their points). But now is the right time to tell you that it was pleasant to work with your cohort, and that it includes a number of people who have earned my respect. Thank you.\n\nP.S. On Friday, December 18, 8 people came to take the exam. Yuliya Sapota, who came to complete a missed module, passed it without any problems and received a pass (she could, by the way, have not taken it: even without this attempt she had enough). The other seven tried to take the exam for some reason without being prepared. Those of them who could only take some modules lost that opportunity — as I wrote, when retaking, you will need to answer questions on the entire course. Honestly, I don't understand why someone who didn't prepare pulls a ticket, sits down to answer, and only then remembers that they didn't have time to get acquainted with the material. Are they hoping to cheat? Can't assess their own level? Simply don't think even one step ahead? Strange...\n\nP.P.S. Another two students passed, another six did not. Dear third-year students, please believe me: the calculation \"I won't spend time on preparation, I'll come and write on a trial basis — maybe it will work\" won't work. It's not advantageous for you, especially in the case if you can still take some of the modules, not all. It's advantageous for you to prepare! At minimum, read the course program for the modules you need to answer, and make sure you understand what is being discussed in ALL the main questions!\n\nI congratulate Ivan Cherepashuk, who took the trouble to improve his already good result!\n\nP.P.P.S. The following dates for taking the pass/fail exam:\n— Wednesday, December 23, 4th pair;\n— Friday, December 25, 4th pair;\n— Monday, December 28, 3rd pair.\n\nBesides these dates, I do not plan to accept exams in the current year, 2015."}